4.3 Article

One-pot synthesis of NiO-MgO nanocatalysts for CO2 reforming of methane: The influence of active metal content on catalytic performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 1165-1173

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.09.065

关键词

Methane dry reforming; One-pot synthesis; NiO-MgO catalyst; Solid solution; Nickel content

资金

  1. National Petrochemical Company, Petrochemical Research and Technology Company (NPC-RT) [0870249214]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a new approach, a series of NiO-MgO solid solution catalysts with different NiO contents (5, 10, 15 and 20 wt %) were prepared by one-pot sol-gel/evaporation method. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption, XRD, TPR, TGA, SEM and TEM techniques were used to correlate the activity and stability to the structural properties of the catalysts. The catalysts exhibited mesoporous structures with high surface areas, large pore volumes and narrow pore size distributions. From 15% NiO content onwards, the TPR profiles showed evidence of isolated NiO phase from the solid solution. The catalytic performance was investigated for carbon dioxide reforming of methane in a fixed bed reactor (ID = 8 mm) at 550-750 degrees C and 1 bar with feed composition CO2/CH4 = 1 and space velocity of 30,000 ml/h.g(cat). The Ni element showed uniform dispersion within the mesoporous matrix illustrating the advantage of the one-pot synthesis method. The Ni particle size was availably confined in this method. It was found that the catalytic activity and stability were strongly affected by the nickel content. The results were revealed that the 10% NiO/MgO catalyst calcined in 600 degrees C combined sufficiently high activity with slight coke formation and excellent catalytic stability at 750 degrees C during dry reforming reaction. Kinetic study revealed that the first-order rate laws were appropriate for main reaction and the catalytic deactivation. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据