4.5 Article

Learning and stabilization of winner-take-all dynamics through interacting excitatory and inhibitory plasticity

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2014.00068

关键词

winner-take-all; competition; plasticity; self-organization; contraction theory; canonical microcircuits; inhibitory plasticity

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021_146608]
  2. European Union ERC Grant neuroP [257219]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_146608] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Winner-Take-All (WTA) networks are recurrently connected populations of excitatory and inhibitory neurons that represent promising candidate microcircuits for implementing cortical computation. WTAs can perform powerful computations, ranging from signal restoration to state-dependent processing. However, such networks require fine tuned connectivity parameters to keep the network dynamics within stable operating regimes. In this article, we show how such stability can emerge autonomously through an interaction of biologically plausible plasticity mechanisms that operate simultaneously on all excitatory and inhibitory synapses of the network. A weight-dependent plasticity rule is derived from the triplet spike-timing dependent plasticity model, and its stabilization properties in the mean field case are analyzed using contraction theory. Our main result provides simple constraints on the plasticity rule parameters, rather than on the weights themselves, which guarantee stable WTA behavior. The plastic network we present is able to adapt to changing input conditions, and to dynamically adjust its gain, therefore exhibiting self-stabilization mechanisms that are crucial for maintaining stable operation in large networks of interconnected subunits. We show how distributed neural assemblies can adjust their parameters for stable WTA function autonomously while respecting anatomical constraints on neural wiring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据