4.7 Article

Reduced graphene oxide induces transient blood-brain barrier opening: an in vivo study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12951-015-0143-z

关键词

Blood-brain barrier; Paracellular pathway; Nanomaterials; MALDI-MSI

资金

  1. Brazilian funding agency Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [11/50400-0, 2012/24782-5]
  2. Brazilian funding agency Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [305099/2011-6, 486142/2012-4]
  3. FAPESP [08/57906-3]
  4. CNPq [573913/2008-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a complex physical and functional barrier protecting the central nervous system from physical and chemical insults. Nevertheless, it also constitutes a barrier against therapeutics for treating neurological disorders. In this context, nanomaterial-based therapy provides a potential alternative for overcoming this problem. Graphene family has attracted significant interest in nanomedicine because their unique physicochemical properties make them amenable to applications in drug/gene delivery and neural interface. Results: In this study, reduced graphene oxide (rGO) systemically-injected was found mainly located in the thalamus and hippocampus of rats. The entry of rGO involved a transitory decrease in the BBB paracellular tightness, as demonstrated at anatomical (Evans blue dye infusion), subcellular (transmission electron microscopy) and molecular (junctional protein expression) levels. Additionally, we examined the usefulness of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) as a new imaging method for detecting the temporal distribution of nanomaterials throughout the brain. Conclusions: rGO was able to be detected and monitored in the brain over time provided by a novel application for MALDI-MSI and could be a useful tool for treating a variety of brain disorders that are normally unresponsive to conventional treatment because of BBB impermeability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据