4.7 Review

Organic-inorganic hybrid nanoflowers: types, characteristics, and future prospects

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12951-015-0118-0

关键词

Biosynthesis; Nanoflowers; Organic-inorganic hybrid

资金

  1. Advanced Production Technology Development Program, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs [312066-3]
  2. Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI13C0862]
  3. Chung-Ang University Graduate Research Scholarship
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20130012543] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic-inorganic hybrid nanoflowers, a newly developed class of flower-like hybrid nanoparticles, have received much attention due to their simple synthesis, high efficiency, and enzyme stabilizing ability. This article covers, in detail, the types, structural features, mechanism of formation, and bio-related applications of hybrid nanoflowers. The five major types of hybrid nanoflowers are discussed, i.e., copper-protein, calcium-protein, and manganese-protein hybrid nanoflowers, copper-DNA hybrid nanoflowers, and capsular hybrid nanoflowers. The structural features of these nanoflowers, such as size, shape, and protein ratio generally determine their applications. Thus, the specific characteristics of hybrid nanoflowers are summarized in this review. The interfacial mechanism of nanoflower formation is examined in three steps: first, combination of metal ion and organic matter; second, formation of petals; third, growth of nanoflowers. The explanations provided herein can be utilized in the development of innovative approaches for the synthesis of hybrid nanoflowers for prospective development of a plethora of hybrid nanoflowers. The future prospects of hybrid nanoflowers in the biotechnology industry, medicine, sensing, and catalysis are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据