4.5 Article

Equilibrium and response properties of the integrate-and-fire neuron in discrete time

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/neuro.10.029.2009

关键词

leaky integrate-and-fire neuron; discrete time; finite synaptic weights; non-linear response; immediate firing rate response; equilibrium properties; perturbation theory; membrane potential distribution

资金

  1. BMBF [01GQ0420]
  2. EU [15879]
  3. Helmholtz Alliance on Systems Biology (Germany)
  4. DIP [F1.2]
  5. MEXT (Japan)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The integrate-and-fire neuron with exponential postsynaptic potentials is a frequently employed model to study neural networks. Simulations in discrete time still have highest performance at moderate numerical errors, which makes them first choice for long-term simulations of plastic networks. Here we extend the population density approach to investigate how the equilibrium and response properties of the leaky integrate-and-fire neuron are affected by time discretization. We present a novel analytical treatment of the boundary condition at threshold, taking both discretization of time and finite synaptic weights into account. We uncover an increased membrane potential density just below threshold as the decisive property that explains the deviations found between simulations and the classical diffusion approximation. Temporal discretization and finite synaptic weights both contribute to this effect. Our treatment improves the standard formula to calculate the neuron's equilibrium firing rate. Direct solution of the Markov process describing the evolution of the membrane potential density confirms our analysis and yields a method to calculate the firing rate exactly. Knowing the shape of the membrane potential distribution near threshold enables us to devise the transient response properties of the neuron model to synaptic input. We find a pronounced non-linear fast response component that has not been described by the prevailing continuous time theory for Gaussian white noise input.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据