4.3 Article

Chronic stress disrupts neural coherence between cortico-limbic structures

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEURAL CIRCUITS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00010

关键词

chronic stress; coherence; power spectrum; hippocampus; prefrontal cortex

资金

  1. FEDER funds through Operational program for competivity factors-COMPETE
  2. national funds through FCT-Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) fellowships [SFRH/BPD/66151/2009, SFRH/BD/40459/2007]
  3. Marie Curie Fellowship [PIEF-GA-2010-273936]
  4. BIAL Foundation [138/2008, 61/2010]
  5. FCT [PTDC/SAU-NSC/118194/2010, FCT/PTDC/SAU-ENB/118383/2010, FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-022674]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/40459/2007, PTDC/SAU-NSC/118194/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic stress impairs cognitive function, namely on tasks that rely on the integrity of cortico-limbic networks. To unravel the functional impact of progressive stress in cortico-limbic networks we measured neural activity and spectral coherences between the ventral hippocampus (vHIP) and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in rats subjected to short term stress (STS) and chronic unpredictable stress (CUS). CUS exposure consistently disrupted the spectral coherence between both areas for a wide range of frequencies, whereas STS exposure failed to trigger such effect. The chronic stress-induced coherence decrease correlated inversely with the vHIP power spectrum, but not with the mPFC power spectrum, which supports the view that hippocampal dysfunction is the primary event after stress exposure. Importantly, we additionally show that the variations in vHIP-to-mPFC coherence and power spectrum in the vHIP correlated with stress-induced behavioral deficits in a spatial reference memory task. Altogether, these findings result in an innovative readout to measure, and follow, the functional events that underlie the stress-induced reference memory impairments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据