4.6 Article

Computational modeling predicts the ionic mechanism of late-onset responses in unipolar brush cells

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00237

关键词

biorealistic modeling; unipolar brush cells; vestibular cerebellum; slow synaptic responses; ionic channel regulation

资金

  1. European Union to Egidio D'Angelo (CEREBNET) [CEREBNET FP7-ITN238686, REALNET FP7-ICT270434]
  2. Human Brain Project [HBP-604102]
  3. Italian Ministry of Health [RF-2009-1475845, GR-2009-143804]
  4. ISCRA grant [IsA07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unipolar Brush Cells (UBCs) have been suggested to play a critical role in cerebellar functioning, yet the corresponding cellular mechanisms remain poorly understood. UBCs have recently been reported to generate, in addition to early-onset glutamate receptor-dependent synaptic responses, a late-onset response (LOR) composed of a slow depolarizing ramp followed by a spike burst (Locate 111 et al., 2013). The LOR activates as a consequence of synaptic activity and involves an intracellular cascade modulating H- and TRP-current gating. In order to assess the LOR mechanisms, we have developed a UBC multi-compartmental model (including soma, dendrite, initial segment, and axon) incorporating biologically realistic representations of ionic currents and a cytoplasmic coupling mechanism regulating TRP and H channel gating. The model finely reproduced UBC responses to current injection, including a burst triggered by a low-threshold spike (LTS) sustained by CaLVA currents, a persistent discharge sustained by CaHVA currents, and a rebound burst following hyperpolarization sustained by H- and CaLVA-currents. Moreover, the model predicted that H- and TRP-current regulation was necessary and sufficient to generate the LOR and its dependence on the intensity and duration of mossy fiber activity. Therefore, the model showed that, using a basic set of ionic channels, UBCs generate a rich repertoire of bursts, which could effectively implement tunable delay-lines in the local microcircuit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据