4.6 Article

GABA-A and NMDA receptor subunit mRNA expression is altered in the caudate but not the putamen of the postmortem brains of alcoholics

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00415

关键词

GABA; glutamate receptor; alcoholism; inhibition; excitation; AMPA; kainate

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
  3. NSW Department of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic consumption of alcohol by humans has been shown to lead to impairment of executive and cognitive functions. Here, we have studied the mRNA expression of ion channel receptors for glutamate and GABA in the dorsal striatum of post-mortem brains from alcoholics (n=29) and normal controls (n=29), with the focus on the caudate nucleus that is associated with the frontal cortex executive functions and automatic thinking and on the putamen area that is linked to motor cortices and automatic movements. The results obtained by qPCR assay revealed significant changes in the expression of specific excitatory ionotropic glutamate and inhibitory GABA-A receptor subunit genes in the caudate but not the putamen. Thus, in the caudate we found reduced levels of mRNAs encoding the GluN2A glutamate receptor and the delta, epsilon, and rho 2 GABA-A receptor subunits, and increased levels of them RNAs encoding GluD1, GluD2, and GABA-A gamma 1 subunits in the alcoholics as compared to controls. Interestingly in the controls, 11 glutamate and 5GABA-A receptor genes were more prominently expressed in the caudate than the putamen (fold-increase varied from 1.24 to 2.91). Differences in gene expression patterns between the striatal regions may underlie differences in associated behavioral outputs. Our results suggest an altered balance between caudate-mediated voluntarily controlled and automatic behaviors in alcoholics, including diminished executive control on goal-directed alcohol- seeking behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据