4.6 Review

Are vesicular neurotransmitter transporters potential treatment targets for temporal lobe epilepsy?

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00139

关键词

vesicular neurotransmitter transporters; temporal lobe epilepsy; epileptogenesis; antiepileptic drugs; SLC17; SLC18; SLC32

资金

  1. agency for Innovation by Science and Technology [IWT/SB/101344]
  2. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO, Belgium) [G038412N]
  3. Queen Elisabeth Medical Foundation
  4. EU COST Action [CM1103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The vesicular neurotransmitter transporters (VNTs) are small proteins responsible for packing synaptic vesicles with neurotransmitters thereby determining the amount of neurotransmitter released per vesicle through fusion in both neurons and glial cells. Each transporter subtype was classically seen as a specific neuronal marker of the respective nerve cells containing that particular neurotransmitter or structurally related neurotransmitters. More recently, however, it has become apparent that common neurotransmitters can also act as co-transmitters, adding complexity to neurotransmitter release and suggesting intriguing roles for VNTs therein. We will first describe the current knowledge on vesicular glutamate transporters (VGLUT1/2/3), the vesicular excitatory amino acid transporter (VEAT), the vesicular nucleotide transporter (VNUT), vesicular monoamine transporters (VMAT1/2), the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) and the vesicular.-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transporter (VGAT) in the brain. We will focus on evidence regarding transgenic mice with disruptions in VNTs in different models of seizures and epilepsy. We will also describe the known alterations and reorganizations in the expression levels of these VNTs in rodent models for temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and in human tissue resected for epilepsy surgery. Finally, we will discuss perspectives on opportunities and challenges for VNTs as targets for possible future epilepsy therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据