4.3 Article

Myoelectrical activity and muscle morphology in a rat model of myofascial trigger points induced by blunt trauma to the vastus medialis

期刊

ACUPUNCTURE IN MEDICINE
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 65-73

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1136/acupmed-2012-010129

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shanghai key discipline projects [S30802]
  2. Guangxi natural science funds projects [Gui Ke zhi 0832200]
  3. Shanghai Key Lab of Human Performance (Shanghai University of Sports) [11DZ2261100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To explore myoelectrical activity and muscle morphology of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in an injury model of rats. Methods A total of 24 male SD rats were randomly divided into a control group (group A) and model group (group B). A blunt striking injury and eccentric exercise were applied to the vastus medialis (VM) of rats in group B for 8 weeks. Later, the palpable taut band (TB), local twitch response, myoelectrical activities and morphology in the two groups were examined. Results An average of 2.5 (30/12) palpable TBs were detected in the VM in group B compared with none in group A. The MTrPs had two types of abnormal potential. Their amplitudes were significantly higher than those in the control group (p<0.01) but their durations showed no significant differences. A series of reflex contractions appeared in groups A and B in response to external stimulation to the ear. Their amplitude and duration in group B were significantly lower than those in group A. A series of lower fibrillation potentials repeatedly occurred in model MTrPs in group B. The morphology of MTrPs showed abnormal muscle fibres with large round or ellipse shapes in cross-section and enlarged tapering shapes in longitudinal section. Conclusions Active MTrPs can be provoked by repeated blunt injury. Active MTrPs are a group of muscle fibres with abnormal shapes and abnormal myoelectrical potentials. External stimulation provokes low-voltage responses in MTrPs, which is different from the response of normal muscle fibres.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据