4.6 Article

Mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass grafting increases the incidence of left internal mammary artery obstruction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 594-600

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12007

关键词

Coronary artery bypass grafting; Graft patency; Mediastinitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) gives a longstanding chronic inflammation and has a detrimental negative effect on long-term survival. For this reason, we aimed to study the effect of mediastinitis on graft patency after CABG. The epidemiologic design was of an exposed (mediastinitis, n = 41) versus non-exposed (non-mediastinitis, controls, n = 41) cohort with two endpoints: (i) obstruction of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and (ii) obstruction of the internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts. The graft patency was evaluated with coronary CT-angiography examination at a median follow-up of 27 years. The number of occluded SVG in the mediastinitis group was 189% versus 155% in the control group. Using generalized estimating equations model with exchangeable matrix, and confounding effect of ischaemic time and patients age, we found no significant association between presence of mediastinitis and SVG obstruction [rate ratio (RR) = 096, 95% CI (052-267), P = 0697]. The number of occluded IMA grafts was 105% in the mediastinitis group and 24% in the control group. Using the Poisson regression model, we estimated RR = 548, 95% CI (143-210) and P = 0013. There was a significant association between mediastinitis and IMA graft obstruction, when controlling for the confounding effect of ischaemic time, body mass index, presence of diabetes mellitus and the number of diseased vessels. Presence of mediastinitis increases the risk of IMA graft obstruction. This may confirm the importance of inflammation as a major contributor to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and explain the negative effect of mediastinitis on a long-term survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据