4.1 Review

Beckwith-Wiedemann and Russell-Silver Syndromes: from new molecular insights to the comprehension of imprinting regulation

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000037

关键词

11p15-related syndromes; Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome; imprinting defects related metabolic disorders; multilocus imprinting disorders; Russell-Silver Syndrome

资金

  1. INSERM
  2. UPMC-Paris6
  3. ANR EPIFEGRO
  4. Pfizer
  5. Agence de Biomedecine
  6. People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme under REA [290123]
  7. Novonordisk
  8. INSERM-ANR EPIFEGRO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of reviewThe imprinted human 11p15.5 region encompasses two imprinted domains important for the control of fetal growth: the H19/IGF2 domain in the telomeric region and the KCNQ1OT1/CDKN1C domain in the centromeric region. These two domains are differentially methylated and each is regulated by its own imprinting control region (ICR): ICR1 in the telomeric region and ICR2 in the centromeric region. Aberrant methylation of the 11p15.5 imprinted region, through genetic or epigenetic mechanisms, leads to two clinical syndromes, with opposite growth phenotypes: Russell-Silver Syndrome (RSS; with severe fetal and postnatal growth retardation) and Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome (BWS; an overgrowth syndrome).Recent findingsIn this review, we discuss the recently identified molecular abnormalities at 11p15.5 involved in RSS and BWS, which have led to the identification of cis-acting elements and trans-acting regulatory factors involved in the regulation of imprinting in this region. We also discuss the multilocus imprinting disorders identified in various human syndromes, their clinical outcomes and their impact on commonly identified metabolism disorders.SummaryThese new findings and progress in this field will have direct consequence for diagnostic and predictive tools, risk assessment and genetic counseling for these syndromes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据