4.4 Article

FGF-23 associated with the progression of coronary artery calcification in hemodialysis patients

期刊

BMC NEPHROLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-241

关键词

Fibroblast growth factor-23; Coronary artery calcification; Vascular calcification; Hemodialysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Disordered mineral metabolism is implicated in the pathogenesis of vascular calcification in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) is the main regulator of phosphate metabolism. In this prospective study, we aimed to investigate the association of serum FGF-23 with progression of coronary artery calcification in HD patients. Methods: Seventy-four HD patients (36 male/38 female, mean age: 52 +/- 14 years) were included. Serum FGF-23 levels were measured by ELISA. Coronary artery calcification score (CACS) was measured twice with one year interval. Patients were grouped as progressive (PG) (36 patients-48%) and non-progressive (NPG). Results: Age, serum phosphorus, baseline and first year CACS were found to be significantly higher in the PG compared to NPG group. Serum FGF-23 levels were significantly higher in PG [155 (80-468) vs 147 (82-234), p = 0.04]. Patients were divided into two groups according to baseline CACS (low group, CACS <= 30; high group, CACS > 30). Serum FGF-23 levels were significantly correlated with the progression of CACS (Delta CACS) in the low baseline CACS group (r = 0.51, p = 0.006), but this association was not found in high baseline CACS group (r = 0.11, p = 0.44). In logistic regression analysis for predicting the PG patients; serum FGF-23, phosphorus levels and baseline CACS were retained as significant factors in the model. Conclusions: Serum FGF-23 was found to be related to progression of CACS independent of serum phosphorus levels. FGF-23 may play a major role in the progression of vascular calcification especially at the early stages of calcification process in HD patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据