4.2 Review

Pediatric fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: Foundation, application and future directions

期刊

PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 397-405

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2012/908061

关键词

Adolescents; Anxiety; Children; Fear-avoidance; Pain; Parent-child; Pediatric

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarships Master's Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GJG Asmundson, M Noel, M Petter, HA Parkerson. Pediatric fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: Foundation, application and future directions. Pain Res Manage 2012;17(6):397-405. The fear-avoidance model of chronic musculoskeletal pain has become an increasingly popular conceptualization of the processes and mechanisms through which acute pain can become chronic. Despite rapidly growing interest and research regarding the influence of fear-avoidance constructs on pain-related disability in children and adolescents, there have been no amendments to the model to account for unique aspects of pediatric chronic pain. A comprehensive understanding of the role of fear-avoidance in pediatric chronic pain necessitates understanding of both child/adolescent and parent factors implicated in its development and maintenance. The primary purpose of the present article is to propose an empirically-based pediatric fear-avoidance model of chronic pain that accounts for both child/adolescent and parent factors as well as their potential interactive effects. To accomplish this goal, the present article will define important fear-avoidance constructs, provide a summary of the general fear-avoidance model and review the growing empirical literature regarding the role of fear-avoidance constructs in pediatric chronic pain. Assessment and treatment options for children with chronic pain will also be described in the context of the proposed pediatric fear-avoidance model of chronic pain. Finally, avenues for future investigation will be proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据