4.1 Article

Determinants of short- and long-term survival from colorectal cancer in very elderly patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 376-383

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2014.04.005

关键词

Colorectal cancer; Relative survival; Elderly; Ageing; Oxidative damage; Lipid peroxidation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Over 5100 colorectal cancers (CRCs) are diagnosed in the United Kingdom in 85 years and older age group per year but little is known of cancer progression in this group. We assessed clinical, pathological and molecular features of CRC with early and late mortality in such patients. Methods: Data were analysed in relation to early mortality and long-term survival in 90 consecutive patients with CRC aged 85 years or older in a single hospital. Results: Patients not undergoing operation, those with an ASA score of III or greater and those with advanced tumour stage were more likely to die within 30 days. Regression analysis showed that 30 day mortality was independently related to failure to undergo resection (odds ratio (O.R.), 10.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-58.2; p = 0.01) and an ASA score of III or greater (O.R. 13.0; 95% CI., 1.4-12.6; p = 0.03). All cause three and five year survival were 47% and 23% respectively for patients who are alive 30 days after diagnosis. Three and five year relative survivals were 64% and 54%, respectively. Long-term outcome was independently related to tumour stage (relative risk [R.R.], 2; 95% C.I., 1.3-3.1; p = 0.001), presence of co-morbid diseases (R.R., 2.8; 95% C.I., 1.3-6.0; p = 0.007) and lipid peroxidation status (R.R., 2.9; 95% C.I., 1.1-7.5; p = 0.025). Conclusions: An active multidisciplinary approach to the care of patients with CRC at the upper extreme of life is reasonable. It also seems sensible to individualise care based upon the extent of disease at diagnosis and the presence of co-morbid conditions. Further studies to examine the role of lipid peroxidation are warranted. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据