4.1 Article

Accuracy of the G-8 geriatric-oncology screening tool for identifying vulnerable elderly patients with cancer according to tumour site: The ELCAPA-02 study

期刊

JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 11-19

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2013.08.003

关键词

Cancer; Elderly; Screening; Accuracy; Validation

资金

  1. Institut National du Cancer (INCA) [RINC 4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Objective: G-8 screening tool showed good screening properties for identifying vulnerable elderly patients with cancer who would benefit from a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). We investigated whether tumour site and metastatic status affected its accuracy. Materials and Methods: Design: Cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort study. Setting: Geriatric-oncology clinics of two teaching hospitals in the urban area of Paris. Participants: Patients aged 70 or over (n = 518) with breast (n = 113), colorectal (n = 108), urinary-tract (n = 89), upper gastrointestinal/liver (n = 85), prostate (n = 69), or other cancers (n = 54). Measurements: Reference standard for diagnosing vulnerability was the presence of at least one abnormal test among the Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Instrumental ADL, Mini-Mental State Examination, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatrics, Timed Get-Up-and-Go, and Mini-Geriatric Depression Scale. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of G-8 scores 5 14 were compared according to tumour site and patient characteristics. Results: Median age was 80; 48.2% had metastases. Prevalence of vulnerability and abnormal G-8 score was 84.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 81-87.3) and 79.5% (95% CI, 76-83).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据