4.1 Article

Falls in men on androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 32-39

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2010.03.004

关键词

Androgen deprivation; Falls; Prostate cancer; Men; Aged

资金

  1. Toronto General and Toronto Western Research Fund
  2. Canadian Cancer Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a common treatment for prostate cancer (PC). However, it may increase the risk of falls due to decreases in testosterone, lean body mass and strength. Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. However, the impact of ADT on falls remains unclear. Materials and methods: Three groups matched on age and education were recruited: PC patients starting continuous ADT (ADT users) (n=88), PC patients not receiving ADT (PC controls) (n=86), and healthy controls (n=86). Patients retrospectively reported any falls in the 12 months prior to study entry and prospectively at 3 time points over the next 12 months (after starting ADT). Physical performance measures were done at each time point. The risks of having a fall at both baseline and over 1 year of follow-up were analyzed using logistic regression. Result: At baseline 13.8% (n=36) of patients (ADT users=14.7%, PC controls=8.1%, healthy controls=18.6%, p=0.132) reported falls in the prior year. In the multivariable model, Timed Up and Go, marital status and working status predicted fall risk at baseline. Over 12 months, 24.8% (n=62) of patients (ADT users=34.5%, PC controls=18.1%, healthy controls=21.7%, p=0.035) reported falls. Prior history of falls, being unmarried and arthritis were independent predictors of falls whereas ADT use was borderline (p=0.08). Conclusion: ADT use may be associated with an increased risk of falls, but larger confirmatory studies are needed. Additionally, multiple non-physical factors including prior history of falls and arthritis predict future falls in older men on ADT. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据