4.2 Article

Dual Diagnosis Screening Interview to Identify Psychiatric Comorbidity in Substance Users: Development and Validation of a Brief Instrument

期刊

EUROPEAN ADDICTION RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 41-48

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000351519

关键词

Psychopathology; Dual diagnosis; Screening; Dual Diagnosis Screening Instrument

资金

  1. Plan Nacional de Drogas [MSCSI/05/03, 2009I032]
  2. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Instituto Carlos III-FEDER [PI060940, RD06/0001/1009, RD12/0028/0009, 0018, ETE PI PI06/90491, PI070960]
  3. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R01DA017987]
  4. Foundation for AIDS Research (amfAR) [106953]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a brief tool, the Dual Diagnosis Screening Instrument (DDSI), to screen psychiatric disorders in substance users in treatment and nontreatment-seeking samples. Methods: A total of 827 substance users (66.5% male, mean age 28.6 +/- 9.9 years) recruited in treatment (in- and outpatient) and non-treatment (substance user volunteers in university research studies) settings were assessed by trained interviewers using the DDSI and the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM) as the criterion standard. Both instruments were administered blind to the results of the other. Disorders obtained with the DDSI were compared to lifetime diagnoses obtained with the PRISM. Sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive values were estimated. Also test-retest reliability of the DDSI was assessed. Results: The DDSI showed a high sensitivity (>= 80%) for identifying lifetime depression, mania, psychosis, panic, social phobia, and specific phobia disorders. Specificity was >= 82% for those diagnoses. Test-retest. showed excellent agreement (range 81-95%). The mean duration of the DDSI administration was 16.8 +/- 2.5 min. Conclusion: The DDSI is a valid and easy-to-administer screening tool to detect possible psychiatric comorbidity among substance users. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据