4.4 Article

Hydrological analysis for water level projections in Taihu Lake, China

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 14-22

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12015

关键词

Anthropogenic activities; climate change; flood; hydrological simulation; scenario analysis; Taihu Lake

资金

  1. Government Office for Science, Defra
  2. Foreign and Commonwealth Office
  3. United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E523248/1]
  5. NSFC (National Natural Science Foundation of China) [50979005]
  6. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund [2013XJ019]
  7. Key Technologies R&D Program of China [2012BAC21B02]
  8. NERC [NE/E523248/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E523248/1, ceh010022] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Changes in precipitation can be expected to have a major influence on the frequency and severity of flooding in the Taihu Basin. As part of an integrated assessment of flood risk in the Taihu Basin, this paper addresses the hydrological conditions and the potential impacts of climate change on Taihu Lake water levels. The hydrological system is simulated by using the distributed hydrological model VIC (Variable Infiltration Capacity), with future climate scenarios generated by the regional climate model PRECIS (Providing Regional Climates for Impacts Studies). The results indicate that maximum and mean flood water levels under the A2 and B2 scenarios for 20212050 will be higher than the levels during the baseline period (19611990), with larger increases under the B2 scenario than for the A2 scenario. The storm return periods leading to extreme water levels in the Taihu Lake in the future is projected to decrease significantly in comparison to the baseline period, implying the potential for the more frequent occurrence of major floods. These results indicate the importance of planning for future flood control in the Taihu Basin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据