4.6 Article

Collagen-mimetic hydrogels promote human endothelial cell adhesion, migration and phenotypic maturation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 3, 期 40, 页码 7912-7919

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5tb00990a

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 EB013297, R03 EB0152167]
  2. NSF DMR CAREER Award [1346807]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Materials Research [1346807] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work evaluates the response of human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) to thromboresistant collagen-mimetic hydrogel coatings toward improving the biocompatibility of existing off-the-shelf'' small-caliber vascular grafts. Specifically, bioactive hydrogels - previously shown to support alpha(1)/alpha(2) integrin-mediated cell adhesion but to resist platelet activation - were fabricated by combining poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) with a 120 kDa, triple-helical collagen-mimetic protein (Scl2-2) containing the GFPGER adhesion sequence. Analysis of HAECs seeded onto the resulting PEG-Scl2-2 hydrogels demonstrated that HAEC adhesion increased with increasing Scl2-2 concentration, while HAEC migration rate decreased over this same concentration range. In addition, evaluation of HAEC phenotype at confluence indicated significant differences in the gene expression of NOS3, thrombomodulin, and E-selectin on the PEG-Scl2-2 hydrogels relative to PEG-collagen controls. At the protein level, however, only NOS3 was significantly different between the PEG-Scl2-2 and PEG-collagen surfaces. Furthermore, PECAM-1 and VE-cadherin expression on PEG-Scl2-2 hydrogels versus PEG-collagen controls could not be distinguished at either the gene or protein level. Cumulatively, these data indicate the PEG-Scl2-2 hydrogels warrant further investigation as off-the-shelf'' graft coatings. In future studies, the Scl2-2 protein can potentially be modified to include additional extracellular matrix or cytokine binding sites to further improve endothelial cell responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据