4.4 Article

Whole-community genome amplification (WCGA) leads to compositional bias in methane-oxidizing communities as assessed by pmoA-based microarray analyses and QPCR

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 1, 期 5, 页码 434-441

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00066.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Schure-Beijerinck-Popping fund [SBP/JK/2005-15]
  2. ESF-EUCORES Eurodiversity collaborative research project METHECO [FP018]
  3. EU [ERAS-CT-2003-98049]
  4. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [855.01.108]
  5. FWF, Austria [I40-B06]
  6. Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW) [4580]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Whole-genome amplification (WGA) using multiple displacement amplification (MDA) has recently been introduced to the field of environmental microbiology. The amplification of single-cell genomes or whole-community metagenomes decreases the minimum amount of DNA needed for subsequent molecular community analyses. The resolution of profiling methods of environmental microbial communities will increase substantially by the use of the whole-community genome amplification (WCGA) procedure, assuming that the original community composition is not affected qualitatively as well as quantitatively. The present study aims to test if WCGA introduces a bias when applied to aerobic proteobacterial methanotrophic communities. For this, first, we subjected samples from freshwater lake sediment to WCGA, and amplified using primers targeting the pmoA gene coding for the alpha-subunit of the methane monooxygenase enzyme. Second, we analysed community composition using a diagnostic microarray and quantitative PCR (QPCR) assays. These methods clearly demonstrated that the WCGA amplification introduced a bias. Thus, numbers of gamma-proteobacterial methanotrophs ('type Ia') increased significantly while the alpha-proteobacterial methanotrophs ('type II') were not amplified by the WCGA procedure. It is hypothesized that this bias is caused by the differences in GC content, which may compromise the efficiency of the MDA reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据