4.8 Article

Mechanism and active site of photocatalytic water splitting on titania in aqueous surroundings

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 2256-2264

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3sc53385a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21173051, 21361130019]
  2. 973 program [2011CB808500, 2013CB834603]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [08DZ2270500]
  4. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institute of Higher Learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocatalytic water splitting is regarded as an important route for generating renewable energy. Here, charged-slab first principles calculations integrated with a periodic continuum solvation model is utilized to analyze the initiating steps of water splitting on the two most common TiO2 surfaces, namely, rutile (110) and anatase (101), at the solid-water interface. It is found that the first proton removal of water (H2O + hole(+) -> OH + H+) is sensitive to the crystalline phase and surface. The rutile (110) surface is more active for water splitting, with the calculated barrier of O-H bond breaking being 0.2 eV lower compared to that on anatase (101). The higher activity of rutile is not due to the redox level of the hole (the position of the valence band maximum), but caused by the more favorable local bonding geometry of the surface. Unexpectedly, the photogenerated hole does not promote O-H bond breaking, and the charge transfer occurs after the H2O dissociation when the surface O nearby the dissociated OH anion traps the hole. The solvation plays an important catalytic role to stabilize and remove protons from the reaction site, which effectively inhibits the charge-recombination of the dissociated OH anion with the proton. The theory presented here shows that the chemical properties of the surface play a significant role in the photocatalytic process, and a strategy based on simple structural parameters is proposed towards the design of new photocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据