4.6 Review

Nanocoating for biomolecule delivery using layer-by-layer self-assembly

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 3, 期 45, 页码 8757-8770

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5tb00450k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [2R01AR055650, 1R01AR063717]
  2. Stanford Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
  3. NIH [R01DE024772-01]
  4. California Institute of Regenerative Medicine Tools and Technologies Awards
  5. National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER Award
  6. Stanford Child Health Research Institute Faculty Scholar Award
  7. Stanford Child Health Research Institute
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR055650, R01AR063717] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE024772] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since its introduction in the early 1990s, layer-by-layer (LbL) self-assembly of films has been widely used in the fields of nanoelectronics, optics, sensors, surface coatings, and controlled drug delivery. The growth of this industry is propelled by the ease of film manufacture, low cost, mild assembly conditions, precise control of coating thickness, and versatility of coating materials. Despite the wealth of research on LbL for biomolecule delivery, clinical translation has been limited and slow. This review provides an overview of methods and mechanisms of loading biomolecules within LbL films and achieving controlled release. In particular, this review highlights recent advances in the development of LbL coatings for the delivery of different types of biomolecules including proteins, polypeptides, DNA, particles and viruses. To address the need for co-delivery of multiple types of biomolecules at different timing, we also review recent advances in incorporating compartmentalization into LbL assembly. Existing obstacles to clinical translation of LbL technologies and enabling technologies for future directions are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据