4.8 Article

Revisiting the optical signatures of BODIPY with ab initio tools

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 1950-1963

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3sc22265a

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [Marches 278845]
  2. European Research Council (ERC)
  3. Region des Pays de la Loire [278845]
  4. recrutement sur poste strategique
  5. GENCI-CINES/IDRIS [c2012085117]
  6. CCIPL (Centre de Calcul Intensif des Pays de Loire)
  7. local Troy cluster

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BODIPY dyes constitute one of the most efficient class of fluorescent molecules, yet their absorption and emission signatures are hardly predictable with theoretical tools. Here, we use a robust Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory approach that simultaneously accounts for solvent and vibrational effects, in order to simulate the optical properties of a large panel of BODIPY derivatives. In particular, this contribution is focussed on the accurate determination of both the 0-0 energies and vibronic shapes, that allow meaningful comparisons between experimental measurements and theoretical simulations. It turns out that Truhlar's M06-2X functional is well suited for modelling the variations of the 0-0 energies induced by side groups, modifications of the skeleton, stiffening or extension of the pi-path. Indeed, while the absolute mean deviation remains quite sizeable, the determination coefficient between experimental and theoretical energies is exceptionally large (R-2 = 0.98), highlighting the robustness of the proposed approach. In addition, for most BODIPYs, theory is able to accurately reproduce vibrationally resolved bands. The developed protocol was successfully applied to provide insights for both pH and ion sensors. It also allowed the understanding of the optical behaviours of a series of BODIPY dimers and NIR dyes. This constitutes an unprecedented investigation of several BODIPY dyes both in terms of the number of treated molecules (more than sixty) and of the reliability of the predictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据