4.8 Article

Benzene-fused BODIPY and fully-fused BODIPY dimer: impacts of the ring-fusing at the b bond in the BODIPY skeleton

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 1002-1007

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2sc21768f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan [19685004, 19675001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

4,4-Difluoro-4-bora-3a, 4a-diaza-s-indacenes (BODIPYs) are fascinating dyes with great potentials for various applications. To establish the design principle for the modification of the BODIPY skeleton, we now investigate the electronic impacts of the introduction of ring-fused structures. The DFT calculations revealed that while the benzene-fusing at the a bond in the BODIPY skeleton increases the HOMO level, the benzene-fusing at the b bond leads to a decreased LUMO level. Based on these results, a benzo[b]fused BODIPY 1 and a fully-fused BODIPY dimer 2 were synthesized. X-ray crystal structure analysis demonstrated that the benzo[b]-fused structure significantly perturbs the pi-conjugation with enhancement of an electron-accepting azafulvene character. In the ring-fused BODIPY dimer 2, the central benzene ring is largely deviated from the aromatic benzene geometry. As a consequence, 2 has a significantly low-lying LUMO delocalized along the periphery. In cyclic voltammograms, the benzene-fused BODIPY 1 and fully-fused dimer 2 indeed showed reversible reduction waves at much less negative potentials (E-1/2 = -1.05 V vs. Fc/Fc(+) for 1, -0.85 V for 2), relative to a non-fused BODIPY 3 (E-1/2 = -1.40 V). In addition, the benzene-fused BODIPYs showed broad and intense absorption bands in the Vis-NIR region. In particular, the BODIPY dimer 2 showed an intense absorption at 629 nm with a broad shoulder band reaching 900 nm. Corresponding to the red-shifted absorption, compounds 1 and 2 showed weak fluorescence in the deep red region (lambda(em) = 690 nm, Phi(F) < 0.01) and in the near-infrared region (940 nm, Phi(F) < 0.01), respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据