4.8 Article

Unravelling the fine structure of stacked bipyridine diamine-derived C-3-discotics as determined by X-ray diffraction, quantum-chemical calculations, Fast-MAS NMR and CD spectroscopy

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 2, 期 1, 页码 69-76

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0sc00292e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 625]
  2. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  3. Council for Chemical Research of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (CW-NWO)
  4. EU within EC [MEIF-CT-2006-042044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An in depth investigation of the fine structure adopted by the helical stacks of C-3-discotics 1 incorporating three 3,3'-diamino-2,2'-bipyridine units is described. In the bulk the molecules display liquid crystalline behaviour in a temperature window of >300 K and an ordered rectangular columnar mesophase (Col(ro)) with an inter-disc distance of 3.4 angstrom is assigned. X-Ray diffraction on aligned samples has also revealed a helical superstructure in the liquid crystalline state, and a rotation angle of 13-16 degrees between consecutive discs. The proposed superstructure in the bulk phase has been further substantiated by a combination of quantum-chemical calculations and solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Dilute solution NMR spectroscopy and elaborate CD spectroscopy on aggregated samples have revealed an isodesmic growth pattern of the C-3-discotics. From the combined results it has become evident that the fine tuning interaction responsible for the highly ordered helical architectures is not weak intermolecular hydrogen bonding, but rather rigidification, due to propeller formation after preorganisation by pi-pi interactions. Although all the techniques used underpin the structural features proposed, none of them individually is able to point to a unique structure. However, together the techniques give very strong evidence for a confined ship-screw arrangement in which all amidic carbonyl oxygens point in one direction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据