4.6 Article

Enhanced electropolymerization of poly(xanthurenic acid)-MoS2 film for specific electrocatalytic detection of guanine and adenine

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 3, 期 24, 页码 4884-4891

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5tb00227c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21275084, 41476083, 21422504]
  2. Doctoral Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [20113719130001]
  3. 863 program [2013AA032204]
  4. Scientific and Technical Development Project of Qingdao [12-1-4-3-(23)-jch]
  5. Outstanding Adult-Young Scientific Research Encouraging Foundation of Shandong Province [BS2012CL013]
  6. Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Until now, research studies on the preparation of MoS2-based polymer nanocomposites using the electropolymerization method have been scarce. Herein, for the first time, a poly(xanthurenic acid, Xa) film based on a thin-layer MoS2 support was electrochemically prepared to form a highly electroactive biosensing platform. The thin-layer MoS2 was obtained using a simple ultrasonic method from bulk MoS2. The physical adsorption between MoS2 and aromatic Xa improved the electropolymerization efficiency, accompanied by an increased electrochemical response of PXa. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), cyclic voltammetry (CV), and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) were utilized to characterize the morphology and investigate the electrochemical properties of the prepared interface. Compared with sole PXa or a MoS2 modified electrode, the PXa-MoS2 hybrid interface exhibited good electrocatalytic activity and prominent synergistic effect on guanine and adenine. A PXa-MoS2 nanocomposite has the negative charge and a specific structure, which obviously prompts the adsorption of the positively charged guanine and adenine. Moreover, this nanocomposite is a promising candidate in electrochemical sensing and other electrocatalytic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据