4.6 Article

Factors affecting the stability of chitosan/tripolyphosphate micro- and nanogels: resolving the opposing findings

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 3, 期 29, 页码 5957-5970

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5tb00431d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1133795]
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1133795] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Micro-and nanogels prepared by ionically crosslinking chitosan with tripolyphosphate (TPP) attract keen interest as potential drug carriers. To achieve their optimal performance, it is essential to control their stability to aggregation and dissolution. Yet, literature on this subject (especially at physiological ionic strength and pH) remains filled with opposing reports. Recently, one of us hypothesized that these conflicting findings might stem from: (1) variations in the chitosan molecular structure; (2) the dissimilar particle concentrations used by the various groups; and (3) occasional overreliance on dynamic light scattering (DLS) as the sole analytical tool. To explore this hypothesis, here we use isothermal titration calorimetry, light scattering and UV-vis spectroscopy to analyze the effects of chitosan degree of deacetylation (DD) and particle concentration on chitosan/TPP particle stability. Their dissolution stability increases with the chitosan DD (due to the stronger chitosan/TPP binding) and when the particles are used at higher concentrations, and evidently depends on the chitosan molecular weight. Conversely, their aggregation stability decreases with the DD, because the chitosan is more prone to TPP bridging and becomes more lyophobic at near-neutral (physiological) pH. We also show how using DLS-derived size distributions as the sole tool for characterizing particle stability can lead to erroneous conclusions. Comparison of these findings to literature experimental conditions reconciles many of the opposing reports and provides essential guidelines for tuning chitosan/TPP particle stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据