4.4 Article

Is computer-assisted training effective in improving rehabilitative outcomes after brain injury? A case-control hospital-based study

期刊

DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 356-360

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.04.003

关键词

Computerized cognitive training; Recovery; Rehabilitation outcomes; Stroke; TBI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Rehabilitation of impaired cognitive functions begins to be considered a standard component of medical care after acquired brain injury. Indeed, many evidences support the effectiveness of the two major categories of techniques, i.e. the traditional and computer-assisted ones, which are widely used in cognitive rehabilitative treatment. Objective: Aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of pc - cognitive training in brain injury patients. Methods: We studied 35 subjects (randomly divided into two groups), affected by traumatic or vascular brain injury, having attended from January 2010 to December 2012 the Laboratory of Robotic and Cognitive Rehabilitation of IRCCS Neurolesi of Messina. Cognitive impairment was investigated through psychometric battery, administered before (T0) and two months (T1) after the cognitive pc-training, which was performed only by the experimental group, in addition to conventional treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test with a p < 0.01. Results: At time T0, all patients showed language deficits and cognitive alterations in visual attention and memory abilities. After the rehabilitation program we noted a global improvement in both the groups. However, at T1, the experimental group showed a greater cognitive improvement than the control group, with significant differences in nearly all the neuropsychological tests performed. Conclusions: Our data suggest that cognitive pc-training may be a promising methodology to optimize the rehabilitation outcomes following brain injury. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据