4.6 Article

Superior electric double layer capacitors using micro- and mesoporous silicon carbide sphere

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 3, 期 7, 页码 3944-3951

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta07110g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2014H1A2A1021380]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014H1A2A1021380] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three-dimensional silicon carbide-based frameworks with hierarchical micro and mesoporous structures (MMPSiC) are prepared by employing the template method and carbonization reaction via the aerosol-spray drying method. The mesopores are generated by the self-assembly of a structure-directing agent, while the micropores are derived from the partial evaporation of Si atoms during the carbonization process. MMPSiC has a unique three-dimensionally interconnected micro and mesoporous network; it also exhibits a faster ion-transport behavior and a larger utilization of the surface area of the electric double-layer capacitors. MMPSiC shows a high-charge storage capacity, with a specific capacitance of 253.7 F g(-1) in 1 M Na2SO4 aqueous electrolyte at a scan rate of 5 mV s(-1). In addition, a specific capacitance of 40.3 F g(-1) is measured in the 3-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluorosulfonyl) imide ionic-liquid electrolyte at a scan rate of 5 mV s(-1), with an energy density of 68.56 W h kg(-1); and similar to 98.4% specific capacitance being retained over 20 000 cycles. Such a high supercapacitor performance may arise from a synergistic effect ensured by the dual-pore system, which can provide a large accessible surface area for ion transport/charge storage by the mesopores and a continuous increase of charge accommodation by micropores. These encouraging results demonstrate the great potential of MMPSiC as high-performance electrode materials for supercapacitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据