4.6 Article

Neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and differences in the availability of healthy food stores and restaurants in Sao Paulo, Brazil

期刊

HEALTH & PLACE
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 39-47

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.05.001

关键词

Neighborhood; Food environment; Socioeconomic factors; Disparities; Food stores

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2009/02279-7]
  2. Coordenadoria de ApoioaoCoordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [4180-11-9]
  3. FAPESP [2009/17517-0]
  4. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [559517/2010-6, 476881/2010-2]
  5. Fogarty Brazil [R03 5R03 TW008105]
  6. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [09/17517-0] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Differential access to healthy foods has been hypothesized to contribute to health disparities, but evidence from low and middle-income countries is still scarce. This study examines whether the access of healthy foods varies across store types and neighborhoods of different socioeconomic statuses (SES) in a large Brazilian city. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2010-2011 across 52 census tracts. Healthy food access was measured by a comprehensive in-store data collection, summarized into two indexes developed for retail food stores (HFSI) and restaurants (HMRI). Descriptive analyses and multilevel models were used to examine associations of store type and neighborhood SES with healthy food access. Fast food restaurants were more likely to be located in low SES neighborhoods whereas supermarkets and full service restaurants were more likely to be found in higher SES neighborhoods. Multilevel analyses showed that both store type and neighborhood SES were independently associated with in-store food measures. We found differences in the availability of healthy food stores and restaurants in Sao Paulo city favoring middle and high SES neighborhoods. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据