4.6 Article

Synergistic enhancement and mechanism study of mechanical and moisture stability of perovskite solar cells introducing polyethylene-imine into the CH3NH3PbI3/HTM interface

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 3, 期 44, 页码 22176-22182

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta06008g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Global Frontier R&D Program on Center for Multiscale Energy System and Basic Science Research Program - National Research Foundation under the Ministry of Science [2015R1A1A1A05001115]
  2. Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) [2E25392]
  3. New and Renewable Energy Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korea Government Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy (MTIE) [20133030000130, 20113030010030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High performance perovskite solar cells with high stability in moist air are required for their practical applications. We have developed a simple approach to enhance device stability via the introduction of a polyethyleneimine (PEI) compatibilizer between the perovskite (CH3NH3PbI3) and upper hole transporting material layers (HTMs). The PEI effectively reduces moisture intrusion into the CH3NH3PbI3 layer under a high humidity condition. Moreover, the incorporation of PEI increases the adhesion at the CH3NH3PbI3/HTM interface, which allows the protective HTMs to strongly adhere onto the CH3NH3PbI3 layer during degradation and significantly decreases the direct exposure of CH3NH3PbI3 to moist air. As a result, the solar cell device was found to exhibit remarkably improved moisture stability, maintaining a performance of 85% for 14 days of exposure to 85% relative humidity without any encapsulation. We investigated the effects of the PEI introduction on the perovskite solar cell properties and demonstrated for the first time that the strong adhesion of the CH3NH3PbI3/HTM layer results in a perovskite solar cell device that is not only mechanically stable but also exhibits high long-term stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据