4.6 Article

Hydrothermal preparation of nanoporous TiO2 films with exposed {001} facets and superior photocatalytic activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 3, 期 37, 页码 19115-19122

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta02640g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB632403]
  2. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups [21221004]
  3. Tsinghua-Toshiba Energy and Environment Research Center
  4. Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Environmental Quality
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2652015311, 2652015261, 2652014113]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TiO2 filmswith exposed {001} facets and uniform nanopores in the crystal facets were fabricated on a Ti substrate using the hydrothermal process followed by calcination at 600 degrees C. The effects of pretreatment of the Ti substrate and the hydrothermal conditions (volume ratio of water/isopropanol, hydrothermal time, temperature and HF concentration) on the formation of nanopores in the facets of the TiO2 crystals were investigated. The sizes of the nanopores can be controlled by adjusting the hydrothermal temperature. TG/DTA-MS analysis indicates that HF and isopropanol adsorbed on the Ti substrate are combusted into gas and released during calcination. The effects of cleaning and heat treatment of the hydrothermally treated Ti substrate indicate that the presence of residual organic matter and HF in the TiO2 facets and their transformation and reaction during calcination are essential for nanopore formation on the various facets of the TiO2 crystals. The asprepared nanoporous TiO2 films with exposed {001} facets exhibit considerably higher UV photocatalytic activity for the degradation of pharmaceuticals and personal care products than non-porous TiO2 films with exposed {001} facets and P25 coated on the titanium sheet, revealing that the rational design and fabrication of the nanoporous TiO2 films is an effective method to improve the photocatalytic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据