4.5 Article

Transient UV and Visible Luminescent Dynamics of Si-Rich SiOx Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Light-Emitting Diodes

期刊

IEEE PHOTONICS JOURNAL
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 1351-1364

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JPHOT.2012.2209633

关键词

Silicon nanophotonics; quantum dots and single molecules; light-emitting diodes

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan
  2. Excellent Research Projects of National Taiwan University, Taiwan [NSC 100-2221-E-002-156-MY3, NSC 101-2622-E-002-009-CC2, NSC 101-ET-E-002-004-ET, 99R80301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transient ultraviolet (UV) and visible luminescent dynamics of the metal-oxide-semiconductor light-emitting diodes (MOSLEDs) made on Si-rich SiOx with its O/Si composition ratio detuning from 0.75 to 1.62 are investigated. The size and luminescent wavelength of the buried Si quantum dots (Si-QDs) are controlled by adjusting the O/Si composition ratio of the Si-rich SiOx. Time-resolved photoluminescence shows a lifetime decaying from 11.5 mu s to 67 ns with the Si-QD size reducing from 4.5 to > 1.7 nm. The shorter lifetime for smaller Si-QDs is due to the increased nonphonon-assisted carrier recombination rate in smaller Si-QDs. The Si-QD size shrinkage is obtained by enlarging the O/Si composition ratio via the increase in the N2O/SiH4 fluence ratio during synthesis, which makes the SiOx matrix approaching a standard dioxide with a higher turn-on threshold field under Fowler-Nordheim tunneling. By increasing the O/Si composition ratio from 1.15 to 1. 54, the obtained EL pattern changes its color from red to blue, which is associated with the turn-on voltage increasing from 40 to 175 V. Decreasing the Si-QD size to 1.7 nm inevitably attenuates the EL power to 100 nW and reduces the P/I slope to 0.63 mW/A. The UV EL patterns of MOSLEDs made on the SiO1.62 film are demonstrated with an EL power of 40 nW, and the decay of ITO transmittance to < 30% at an EL wavelength of < 375 nm also contributes to the power attenuation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据