4.6 Article

Theoretical prediction of a highly conducting solid electrolyte for sodium batteries: Na10GeP2S12

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 3, 期 24, 页码 12992-12999

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta01616a

关键词

-

资金

  1. US-India Partnership to Advance Clean Energy-Research (PACER) for the Solar Energy Research Institute for India and the United States (SERIIUS)
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, and Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Solar Energy Technology Program) [DE-AC36-08GO28308]
  3. Government of India, through the Department of Science and Technology [IUSSTF/JCERDC-SERIIUS/2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using first-principles simulations, we predict a high-performance solid electrolyte with composition Na10GeP2S12 for use in sodium-sulfur (Na-S) batteries. The thermodynamic stability of its structure is established through determination of decomposition reaction energies and phonons, while Na-ionic conductivity is obtained using ab initio molecular dynamics at elevated temperatures. Our estimate of the room-temperature (RT) conductivity is 4.7 x 10(-3) S cm(-1), which is slightly higher than those of other superionic solid electrolytes such as beta ''-alumina and Na3Zr2Si2PO12, currently used in practical high-temperature Na-S batteries. Activation energy obtained from the Arrhenius plot (in the range 8001400 K) is 0.2 eV, which is slightly lower than the typical values exhibited by other ceramic conductors (0.25-1 V) (Hueso et al., Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 734). We show that soft Na-S phonon modes are responsible for its thermodynamic stability and the lower activation barrier for diffusion of Na-ions. Finally, the calculated electronic bandgap of 2.7 eV (a wide electrochemical window) augurs well for its safe use in sodium batteries. Opening up a possibility for realizing RT operation of Na-S batteries, our prediction of a new phase in the Na-Ge-P-S system will stimulate experimental studies of the material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据