4.5 Article

Behcet's disease in HLA-B*51 negative Germans and Turks shows association with HLA-Bw4-80I

期刊

ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/ar4569

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  3. Tubingen University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Behcet's disease (BD) as systemic vasculitis of unknown etiology is associated with HLA-B*51 in European and Asian populations. HLA-A*26 was claimed as an additional BD susceptibility marker in Japanese and Greek patients. This study was performed to test for HLA associations in HLA-B*51 negative German and Turkish BD populations. Methods: In total, 65 German and 46 Turkish patients lacking HLA-B*51 were analyzed in comparison to healthy HLA-B*51 negative Germans (n = 1500) and Turks (n = 130). HLA-A/B genotypes were determined by SSOP. P-values with correction for multiple testing (p(c)), X-2-test and odds ratio (OR) were used for statistical evaluation. Results: HLA-A*26 was significantly more frequent in HLA-B*51(-) German patients [p(c) = 0.0076, OR = 3.23, 95% CI 1.63 to 6.39] than in respective controls. HLA-A*26 was also elevated in a smaller group of Turkish patients versus the controls. Significant association of HLA-Bw4 with isoleucine at amino-acid position 80 (HLA-Bw4-80I) was found in the HLA-B*51(-) German cohort of BD patients [p(c) = 0.0042, OR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.93) and in the Turkish patients in comparison to the respective controls [p = 0.025, OR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.31]. On the contrary, HLA-Bw4-80 T was reduced in both HLA-B*51(-) BD patient cohorts. Conclusions: The study shows a significant association of HLA-Bw4-80I present on HLA-B*51 as well as on other B-locus molecules with BD. This indicates that distinctive Bw4 epitopes on HLA-B locus molecules could play a role in BD pathogenesis. The study also indicates an association with HLA-A*26 in German and Turkish BD patients as a genetic risk factor independent of HLA-B*51.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据