4.5 Article

Collagenase-3 (MMP-13) deficiency protects C57BL/6 mice from antibody-induced arthritis

期刊

ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/ar4423

关键词

-

资金

  1. AUTOROME European Community [LSHM-CT-2004-00526]
  2. Marie Cure training fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are important in tissue remodelling. Here we investigate the role of collagenase-3 (MMP-13) in antibody-induced arthritis. Methods: For this study we employed the K/BxN serum-induced arthritis model. Arthritis was induced in C57BL/6 wild type (WT) and MMP-13-deficient (MMP-13(-/-)) mice by intraperitoneal injection of 200 mu l of K/BxN serum. Arthritis was assessed by measuring the ankle swelling. During the course of the experiments, mice were sacrificed every second day for histological examination of the ankle joints. Ankle sections were evaluated histologically for infiltration of inflammatory cells, pannus tissue formation and bone/cartilage destruction. Semi-quantitative PCR was used to determine MMP-13 expression levels in ankle joints of untreated and K/BxN serum-injected mice. Results: This study shows that MMP-13 is a regulator of inflammation. We observed increased expression of MMP-13 in ankle joints of WT mice during K/BxN serum-induced arthritis and both K/BxN serum-treated WT and MMP-13(-/-) mice developed progressive arthritis with a similar onset. However, MMP-13(-/-) mice showed significantly reduced disease over the whole arthritic period. Ankle joints of WT mice showed severe joint destruction with extensive inflammation and erosion of cartilage and bone. In contrast, MMP-13(-/-) mice displayed significantly decreased severity of arthritis (50% to 60%) as analyzed by clinical and histological scoring methods. Conclusions: MMP-13 deficiency acts to suppress the local inflammatory responses. Therefore, MMP-13 has a role in the pathogenesis of arthritis, suggesting MMP-13 is a potential therapeutic target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据