4.5 Article

APRIL, a proliferation-inducing ligand, as a potential marker of lupus nephritis

期刊

ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/ar4095

关键词

-

资金

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University's Ratchadaphiseksomphot Fund
  2. Cluster and Program Management Office (CPMO) National Science and Technology Development Agency [P-10-10221]
  3. Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project in Thailand [HR 1163A]
  4. Ratchadaphiseksomphot Fund, Chulalongkorn University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: BLyS and APRIL are cytokines from the tumor necrosis factor family which play an important role in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Previous works suggested an association between both molecules and SLE disease activity although their correlation with lupus nephritis is not known. We therefore assessed serum BLyS and APRIL in active lupus nephritis patients. Methods: Serum samples from active lupus nephritis and at 6 months post-treatment were obtained. Serum levels of BLyS and APRIL (n = 47) as well as renal mRNA expression were measured. Serum levels of both molecules and clinical data (n = 27) were available at 6 months follow-up. All biopsy-proven lupus nephritis patients were treated with similar immunosuppressive drugs. Results: Serum levels of APRIL were associated with proteinuria (Rs = 0.44, P value < 0.01) and degree of histological activity (Rs = 0.34; P value < 0.05) whereas BLyS levels were associated with complement levels (Rs = 0.46; P value < 0.01) and dosage of immunosuppressant. Interestingly, serum APRIL as well as its intrarenal mRNA levels were associated with resistance to treatment. From the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, high levels (> 4 ng/mL) of serum APRIL predicted treatment failure with a positive predictive value of 93 percent. Conclusion: APRIL could be a potential biomarker for predicting difficult-to-treat cases of lupus nephritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据