4.6 Article

Quantum-sized BiVO4 modified TiO2 microflower composite heterostructures: efficient production of hydroxyl radicals towards visible light-driven degradation of gaseous toluene

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 3, 期 43, 页码 21655-21663

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta05659d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21377015, 21207015]
  2. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB936002]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In an effort to develop visible-light-driven heterostructured photocatalysts with high activity, a novel quantum-sized tubelike BiVO4 sensitized TiO2 microflower catalytic system was successfully fabricated by using a facile hydrothermal and ultrasonic adhering approach. The structural and optical properties of the as-prepared samples were comparatively characterized. The staggered band structure of quantumsized BiVO4 decorated TiO2 not only extended the photo-response range but also promoted photoexcited charges transfer and separation. Photocatalytic activities of the as-prepared samples were examined by the degradation of toluene under visible light irradiation (A > 400 nm). Compared to the individual TiO2 microflower, BiVO4 quantum tube, BiVO4 nanoparticle and nano-BiVO4/TiO2, the quantum-BiVO4/Ti02 (Q-BiVO4/TiO2) composite exhibited higher photo activities. Electron spin resonance (ESR) examinations confirmed the generation of the photo-induced reactive oxygen species (*OH and *02) which were involved in the photocatalytic process of Q-BiVO4/TiO2 composites. Furthermore, the enhanced photocatalytic activity of the Q-BiVO4/TiO2 composite mainly originated from the high separation efficiency of photo-induced electron-hole pairs and the efficient production of hydroxyl radicals. A detailed mechanism accounting for the superior photocatalytic activity was proposed in terms of the energy band structures of the components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据