4.4 Article

Risk of Hospitalized Bacterial Infections Associated With Biologic Treatment Among US Veterans With Rheumatoid Arthritis

期刊

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
卷 66, 期 7, 页码 990-997

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/acr.22281

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [R01-HS-018517, 1U18-HS-016956, R01-HS018517, U18-HS016956]
  2. Anolinx
  3. Genentech
  4. NIH [AR-053351]
  5. NIH/National Institute for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [K24-AR052361]
  6. Pfizer
  7. BMS
  8. Crescendo
  9. UCB
  10. AbbVie
  11. Roche/Genentech
  12. Janssen
  13. CORRONA
  14. Amgen
  15. Savient
  16. Regeneron
  17. URL Pharmaceuticals
  18. Ardea
  19. Allergan
  20. Novartis
  21. Takeda
  22. Roche
  23. Abbott
  24. Merck
  25. Mylan Specialty
  26. Shire
  27. Hoffman-La Roche
  28. Dey Pharma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The comparative risk of infection associated with non-anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic agents is not well established. Our objective was to compare risk for hospitalized infections between anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF biologic agents in US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. Using 1998-2011 data from the US Veterans Health Administration, we studied RA patients initiating rituximab, abatacept, or anti-TNF therapy. Exposure was based upon days supplied (injections) or usual dosing intervals (infusions). Treatment episodes were defined as new biologic agent use. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for hospitalization for a bacterial infection were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for potential confounders. Results. Among 3,152 unique RA patients contributing 4,158 biologic treatment episodes to rituximab (n = 596), abatacept (n = 451), and anti-TNF agents (n = 3,111), the patient mean age was 60 years and 87% were male. The most common infections were pneumonia (37%), skin/soft tissue (22%), urinary tract (9%), and bacteremia/sepsis (7%). Hospitalized infection rates per 100 person-years were 4.4 (95% CI 3.1-6.4) for rituximab, 2.8 (95% CI 1.7-4.7) for abatacept, and 3.0 (95% CI 2.5-3.5) for anti-TNF. Compared to etanercept, the adjusted rate of hospitalized infection was not different for adalimumab (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9-2.2), abatacept (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-2.1), or rituximab (HR 1.4, 0.8-2.6), although it was increased for infliximab (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0). Infection risk was greater for those taking prednisone >7.5 mg/day (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.7) and in the highest quartile of C-reactive protein (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.8) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (HR 4.1, 95% CI 2.3-7.2) compared to the lowest quartile. Conclusion. In older, predominantly male US veterans with RA, the risk of hospitalized bacterial infections associated with rituximab or abatacept was similar to etanercept.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据