4.4 Article

Interstitial Lung Disease in AntiJo-1 Patients With Antisynthetase Syndrome

期刊

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
卷 65, 期 5, 页码 800-808

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acr.21895

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To assess the outcome of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in antiJo-1 patients with antisynthetase syndrome, determine predictive variables of ILD deterioration in these patients, and compare features of antiJo-1 patients with and without ILD. Methods Ninety-one antiJo-1 patients were identified by medical records search in 4 medical centers. All of these patients had undergone pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans. Results Sixty-six patients (72.5%) had ILD. Patients could be divided into 3 groups according to their presenting lung manifestations: acute onset of lung disease (n = 12), progressive onset of lung signs (n = 35), and asymptomatic patients exhibiting abnormalities consistent with ILD on PFTs and HRCT scans (n = 19). Sixteen patients had resolution of ILD; 39 and 11 patients experienced improvement and deterioration of ILD, respectively. ILD led to decreased functional status, since 29.8% of patients exhibited a marked reduction of activities due to ILD and 13.6% had respiratory insufficiency requiring oxygen therapy; 5 of 6 patients died due to ILD complications. Predictive parameters of ILD deterioration were HRCT scan pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia, respiratory muscle involvement, and age 55 years. Furthermore, antiJo-1 patients with ILD, compared with those without, more frequently exhibited mechanic's hands and lower creatine kinase levels. Conclusion Our findings confirm that ILD is a frequent complication in antiJo-1 patients, resulting in high morbidity. We suggest that patients with predictive factors of ILD deterioration may require more aggressive therapy. Finally, antiJo-1 patients with ILD, compared with those without, may exhibit a particular clinical phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据