4.4 Article

Estimated Frequency of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Patients With Pregnancy Morbidity, Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, and Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Critical Review of the Literature

期刊

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
卷 65, 期 11, 页码 1869-1873

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/acr.22066

关键词

-

资金

  1. Government of Lombardy
  2. University of Brescia
  3. University of Milan
  4. Dote Ricerca: FSE, Regione Lombardia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveAntiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance For Clinical Trials and International Networking (APS ACTION) is an international research network devoted to conducting well-designed clinical trials in persistently antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients. One of the first needs of APS ACTION was to know the true aPL frequency in patients with pregnancy morbidity (PM), stroke (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), and deep venous thrombosis (DVT). MethodsThe search for aPL and multiple keywords regarding the outcomes of interest was completed in PubMed. The median frequency for positive aPL tests (lupus anticoagulant, antibody against cardiolipin [aCL], and antibody against (2)-glycoprotein I [anti-(2)GPI]) was calculated for each outcome and was used to estimate the overall aPL frequency. ResultsBased on the analysis of 120 full-text papers, the overall aPL frequency was estimated as 6% for PM, 13.5% for ST, 11% for MI, and 9.5% for DVT. Limitations of the literature were that 60% of the papers were published before 2000, all 3 criteria aPL tests were performed in only 11% of the papers, 36% of papers used a low-titer aCL cutoff, anti-(2)GPI cutoff was quite heterogeneous, aPL confirmation was performed in only one-fifth of papers, and the study design was retrospective in nearly half of the papers. ConclusionIt is difficult to determine the frequency of a clinically significant aPL profile in patients with aPL-related clinical outcomes due to the lack of robust data. Our best estimates of the incidence of aPL-associated events should be confirmed with appropriately designed population studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据