4.4 Article

Population-Based Estimates of Common Comorbidities and Cardiovascular Disease in Ankylosing Spondylitis

期刊

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
卷 63, 期 4, 页码 550-556

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/acr.20408

关键词

-

资金

  1. Region Skane, Sweden
  2. Swedish Social Insurance Agency
  3. Swedish Rheumatism Association
  4. Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To study the rate of common comorbidities and cardiovascular disease in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) compared with the general population seeking health care. Methods. This cohort study included 935 subjects (67% men) ages >= 20 years diagnosed with AS and the adult background population in Southern Sweden. During 2004 to 2007 we recorded the occurrence of physicians' diagnostic codes for a select number of comorbidities commonly associated with AS and cardiovascular disease and risk factors. We obtained standardized morbidity-rate ratios (SMRs) by dividing the observed morbidity rate in AS patients by the expected rate based on the corresponding rate of the disease in the general population of the county seeking health care. Results. The highest SMRs were found for uveitis (34.35, 95% confidence interval [ 95% CI] 28.55-40.98) and inflammatory bowel disease (9.28, 95% CI 7.07-11.97). Also, we found increased SMRs for ischemic heart diseases (2.20, 95% CI 1.77-2.70), hypertension (1.98, 95% CI 1.72-2.28), and diabetes mellitus (1.41, 95% CI 1.10-1.78). Furthermore, the SMRs for psoriasis, osteoporosis, and atrioventricular blocks were also statistically significantly elevated. Conclusion. Inflammatory diseases affecting the eye and the digestive system were the most notable comorbidities in AS patients, but the rate for cardiovascular disease was also high. Using comprehensive longitudinal population-based register data is a promising tool to evaluate the excess consultation rate and total burden of rheumatic disease on patients and society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据