4.5 Article

Quantifying and analyzing neighborhood configuration characteristics to cellular automata for land use simulation considering data source error

期刊

EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 77-86

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12145-012-0097-8

关键词

Land use change; Cellular automata model; Neighborhood configuration; Data source error; Resisting error disturbance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40901214]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2010-Ia-015]
  3. Youth Chenguang Project of Science and Technology of Wuhan City of China [201150431093]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular Automata (CA) simulation models have been increasingly used in land use studies. However, neighborhood configuration, an essential element of CA model, remarkably impacts the accuracy of simulated results. Moreover, errors from data source may propagate through the CA modeling process. The objective of this study is to analyze the effect of neighborhood configuration to CA model and further on to explore its capacity of resisting disturbance from data source error. With statistic-based CA model and several neighborhood configurations respectively, the land use changes of Wuhan, China were analyzed. It is demonstrated that there are significant differences on the simulated results produced by different neighborhoods. Besides, different neighborhoods respond differently to data source error. In light of these results, we find out that (1) neighborhood configurations with larger neighborhood size and planar neighborhood type, introduced in this paper, contribute to higher prediction accuracy; and (2) the neighborhood configurations above also have higher capacity of resisting disturbance from data source error and give rise to more stable simulated results. This study provides a comprehensive basis for scale selection of CA model with a meaningful consideration of data source error and thus will improve the research on land use change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据