4.4 Article

Coinfection of tick cell lines has variable effects on replication of intracellular bacterial and viral pathogens

期刊

TICKS AND TICK-BORNE DISEASES
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 415-422

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.01.010

关键词

Tick cell line; Coinfection; Ehrlichia; Borrelia; Semliki Forest virus; Ixodes spp.

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [088588]
  2. Roslin Institute BBSRC Strategic Programme Grant
  3. Polish School of Medicine Memorial Fund from the University of Edinburgh
  4. POSTICK ITN (Post-graduate training network for capacity building to control ticks and tick-borne diseases) [238511]
  5. BBSRC [BBS/E/I/00001741, BBS/E/I/00001735] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/I/00001741, BBS/E/I/00001735] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ticks transmit various human and animal microbial pathogens and may harbour more than one pathogen simultaneously. Both viruses and bacteria can trigger, and may subsequently suppress, vertebrate host and arthropod vector anti-microbial responses. Microbial coinfection of ticks could lead to an advantage or disadvantage for one or more of the microorganisms. In this preliminary study, cell lines derived from the ticks Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes ricinus were infected sequentially with 2 arthropod-borne pathogens, Borrelia burgdorferi s.s., Ehrlichia ruminantium, or Semliki Forest virus (SFV), and the effect of coinfection on the replication of these pathogens was measured. Prior infection of tick cell cultures with the spirochaete B. burgdorferi enhanced subsequent replication of the rickettsia pathogen E. ruminantium whereas addition of spirochaetes to cells infected with E. ruminantium had no effect on growth of the latter. Both prior and subsequent presence of B. burgdorferi also had a positive effect on SFV replication. Presence of E. ruminantium or SFV had no measurable effect on B. burgdorferi growth. In tick cells infected first with E. ruminantium and then with SFV, virus replication was significantly higher across all time points measured (24, 48, 72 h post infection), while presence of the virus had no detectable effect on bacterial growth. When cells were infected first with SW and then with E. ruminantium, there was no effect on replication of either pathogen. The results of this preliminary study indicate that interplay does occur between different pathogens during infection of tick cells. Further study is needed to determine if this results from direct pathogen pathogen interaction or from effects on host cell defences, and to determine if these observations also apply in vivo in ticks. If presence of one pathogen in the tick vector results in increased replication of another, this could have implications for disease transmission and incidence. (C) 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据