4.4 Article

Relationships between tick counts and coat characteristics in Nguni arid Bonsmara cattle reared on semiarid rangelands in South Africa

期刊

TICKS AND TICK-BORNE DISEASES
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 172-177

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2011.07.001

关键词

Coat score; Hair length; Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus; Semiarid rangelands; Skin thickness; Tick resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Indigenous Nguni cattle are adapted to the semiarid rangeland and appear to be resistant to ticks; however, the mechanism for tick resistance is yet to be established. To understand tick resistance in cattle, relationships among skin thickness, hair length, coat score, and tick counts were estimated in Nguni (n = 12) and Bonsmara (n = 12) heifers on semiarid rangelands of South Africa. The tick species observed to infest the heifers were Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus (frequency: 76%), Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (9%). Amblyomma hebraeum (5%). Rhipicephalus appendiculatus (5%). Rhipicephalus evertsi evertsi (3%), and Hyalomma marginatum (2%). Nguni heifers had lower (P < 0.05) log(10) (x + 1)-transformed coat scores (0.6 +/- 0.01), hair length (1.4 +/- 0.01). and tick counts (1.4 +/- 0.03) than Bonsmara heifers whose log(10) (x + 1)-transformed coat score, hair length, and tick count values were 0.7 +/- 0.01, 1.5 +/- 0.01, and 1.8 +/- 0.02, respectively. The skin thickness between the two breeds were similar (P > 0.05). There was a positive linear (P < 0.05) relationship between log(10) (x + 1) tick counts and log(10) (x + 1) coat score in the Nguni (y = 1.90x - 0.40) and a quadratic relationship in the Bonsmara (y = -7.98x(2) + 12.74x - 3.12) breed. It was concluded that the smooth coats may be one of the important mechanisms of tick resistance in the indigenous Nguni breed. Determination of genetic resistance to ticks in the Nguni breed is recommended as this will give more specific indication to the mechanism of host resistance in this breed. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据