4.4 Article

Fabrication, Characterization and Suppression of Supercooling in Microencapsulated n-Octadecane with Methyl Methacrylate-Octadecyl Methacrylate Copolymer as Shell

期刊

SCIENCE OF ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 120-127

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/sam.2014.1690

关键词

Phase Change Material; Microcapsule; Crystallization; Supercooling Suppression

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51203113, 20904040, 21174105]
  2. Key Project of Tianjin Municipal Natural Science Foundation [12JCZDJC26800]
  3. Youth Science Found Project [2051203113]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supercooling remains a key issue for the potential application of microencapsulated phase change materials (MicroPCMs). The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of the composition of a shell on the suppression of supercooling for MicroPCMs. Microcapsules containing n-octadecane (MicroC18) with various compositions of methyl methacrylate (MMA)-octadecyl methacrylate (ODMA) copolymer as shells were fabricated through suspension-like polymerization. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) micrographs show that a series of microcapsules with spherical shapes were formed. The average diameter of MicroC18 was in the range of 1.30-1.36 mu m. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results indicated that all the MicroC18 crystallizes into a stable triclinic phase via a metastable rotator phase (R-I) from the liquid phase. The occurrence of R-I phase is attributed to the lower nucleation barrier decreased by the surface freezing, which is detected by X-ray Diffraction. Supercooling of similar to 9 degrees C is observed in the cooling process for the MicroC18 with single PMMA shell (MicroC18(0)). MicroC18 with comb-like copolymer shells have lower onset and peak melting temperature than that of MicroC18(0). Supercooling of MicroC18 is not effectively suppressed until the molar ratio of ODMA reaches 0.3. A hypothesis to explain this behavior is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据