4.4 Article

Rapid quantification of myocardial fibrosis: A new macro-based automated analysis

期刊

ANALYTICAL CELLULAR PATHOLOGY
卷 33, 期 5-6, 页码 257-269

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2010/858356

关键词

Collagen; fibrosis; slide scanner; whole slide image; image analysis; open source; Picrosirius red; polarised light; stereology

资金

  1. Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Fibrosis is associated with various cardiac pathologies and dysfunction. Current quantification methods are time-consuming and laborious. We describe a semi-automated quantification technique for myocardial fibrosis and validated this using traditional methods. Methods: Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) was induced in adult Wistar rats by subcutaneous monocrotaline (MCT) injection (40 mg/kg). Cryosections of myocardial tissue (5 mu m) of PH rats (n = 9) and controls (n = 9) were stained using Picrosirius red and scanned with a digital microscopic Mirax slide scanner. From these sections 21 images were taken randomly of each heart. Using ImageJ software a macro for automated image analysis of the amount of fibrosis was developed. For comparison, fibrosis was quantified using traditional polarisation microscopy. Both methods were correlated and validated against stereology as the gold standard. Furthermore, the method was tested in paraffin-embedded human tissues. Results: Automated analysis showed a significant increase of fibrosis in PH hearts vs. control. Automated analysis correlated with traditional polarisation and stereology analysis (r(2) = 0.92 and r(2) = 0.95, respectively). In human heart, lungs, kidney and liver, a similar correlation with stereology (r(2) = 0.91) was observed. Time required for automated analysis was 22 and 33% of the time needed for stereology and polarisation analysis, respectively. Conclusion: Automated quantification of fibrosis is feasible, objective and time-efficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据