4.6 Article

Glucose-assisted synthesis of the hierarchical TiO2 nanowire@MoS2 nanosheet nanocomposite and its synergistic lithium storage performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 3, 期 6, 页码 2762-2769

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta05249h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91333122, 51372082, 51172069, 50972032, 61204064, 51202067]
  2. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20110036110006, 20120036120006, 20130036110012]
  3. Science and Technology Program Foundation of Suzhou City [SYG201215]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. CSIRO Office of the Chief Executive (OCE) Science Leader Scheme
  6. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hierarchical nanocomposite of TiO2 nanowires decorated with molybdenum disulfide nanosheets (TiO2@MoS2) was synthesized by a facile and low-cost glucose-assisted hydrothermal approach. In this hierarchical nanocomposite, TiO2 nanowires served as an effective backbone for the nucleation and growth of few layered MoS2 nanosheets. Both glucose and the roughness of anatase-TiO2 (B) nanowires played important roles in the formation of the uniform TiO2 nanowire@MoS2 nanosheet (<= 6 layers) nanocomposite. A synergistic effect was demonstrated on the nanocomposite of the TiO2 nanowire@MoS2 nanosheet. The one-dimensional robust TiO2 nanowire backbone provided a shortened and efficient pathway for electron and lithium ion transport and minimized the strain of the volume changes, while ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets offered high electrode/electrolyte interfacial contact areas, promoted rapid charge transfer and contributed to a high specific capacity. The favourable synergistic effect led to enhanced specific capacity, good cycling stability and superior rate capability of the nanocomposite, compared with either individual component. Such a TiO2 nanowire@ MoS2 nanosheet nanocomposite is a promising anode material for high performance lithium ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据