4.6 Review

HCV and Oxidative Stress in the Liver

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 439-469

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v5020439

关键词

hepatitis C; oxidative stress; Nrf2/ARE pathway; antioxidant defense; iron homeostasis; regulation

类别

资金

  1. Russian Ministry of Education and Science [11.519.11.2017]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [10-04-00047a, 11-04-01569a, 12-04-90447-Ukr_a]
  3. Molecular and Cellular Biology Program of Presidium of Russian Academy of Sciences
  4. President of Russian Federation [MK-5035.2011.4]
  5. Swedish Research Council [K2009-66X-21053-01-3, K2011-79X-21744-01-6]
  6. New Visby program of the Swedish Institute [00747/2010, 00885/2011]
  7. ANRS
  8. Region Rhone Alpes
  9. Labex DevWeCan
  10. ANR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the etiological agent accounting for chronic liver disease in approximately 2-3% of the population worldwide. HCV infection often leads to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, various metabolic alterations including steatosis, insulin and interferon resistance or iron overload, and development of hepatocellular carcinoma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Multiple molecular mechanisms that trigger the emergence and development of each of these pathogenic processes have been identified so far. One of these involves marked induction of a reactive oxygen species (ROS) in infected cells leading to oxidative stress. To date, markers of oxidative stress were observed both in chronic hepatitis C patients and in various in vitro systems, including replicons or stable cell lines expressing viral proteins. The search for ROS sources in HCV-infected cells revealed several mechanisms of ROS production and thus a number of cellular proteins have become targets for future studies. Furthermore, during last several years it has been shown that HCV modifies antioxidant defense mechanisms. The aim of this review is to summarize the present state of art in the field and to try to predict directions for future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据